Showing all articles
Showing Results 181 - 200 of 600

  • Minimum Compensation an Update on County of Dakota V. Cameron, IV

    10/02/2012 / Timothy A. Rye

    In 2006 the Minnesota Legislature adopted a law intended to provide for just compensation to a property owner who is forced to relocate because of a public project. Our first glimpse of judicial interpretation of minimum compensation arrived on March 26, 2012, from the Minnesota Court of Appeals in County of Dakota v. Cameron IV,A11-1273 (Minn. App. March 26, 2012).

    Read More  
  • You Want my Facebook Password?!?! Recent Legislative Trends in Social Networking Privacy and the Workplace

    09/26/2012 / Susan E. Tegt

    Since the advent of social media, employers have used social media as a tool for vetting job applicants by reviewing applicants’ and employees’ public internet profiles and postings on websites such as Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter. When this information is publicly available, an employer’s review of social media sites entirely legal, so long as the employment decision is not made on a discriminatory basis. Earlier this year, however, the Associated Press identified an increasing trend where employers are not just reviewing publicly accessible social media profiles, but also asking applicants to disclose their usernames and passwords for social media websites that are restricted to the public or otherwise designated as “private.” 

    Read More  
  • Van Cleve Discusses Lawsuit Regarding a Rochester Shopping Development

    09/11/2012

    Gary Van Cleve was quoted in a PostBulletin.com article discussing a case between Franklin and Bonnie Kottschade and MnDot. Van Cleve is representing the Kottschades' who have been in legal battles with MnDot since 2003. Currently, the Kottschades' are seeking the right to install a driveway in front of the northwest Rochester shopping development.

    Read the full article, Developer Says Loss of Driveway Stalled Rochester Shopping Center, on the PostBulletin.com website.

    Read More  
  • The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota Makes Substantive Changes to its Motion Practice Rules

    07/31/2012 / Glenna L. Gilbert

    On July 23, 2012, the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota amended its local rules. Although most of the changes were stylistic in nature only, the Court made substantive changes to Local Rules 7.1, 16.2, 16.3, 16.6, 26.1, and 72.2.

    Read More  
  • Minnesota Court of Appeals Rejects Private Right of Action for Termination in Retaliation for Applying for Unemployment Benefits

    07/31/2012 / John A. Kvinge

    In a case decided July 9, 2012, the Minnesota Court of Appeals held that the Minnesota Unemployment Insurance Law does not create a private right of action for retaliatory discharge.

    Read More  
  • Are You Letting Your Trade Secrets Walk Out the Door Each Night?

    07/18/2012 / John A. Kvinge

    At least 46 states have enacted some version of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, which provides protection for information that “derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use.” The Uniform Trade Secrets Act allows the owner of a trade secret to bring a lawsuit for misappropriation against someone who uses a trade secret obtained through improper means.

    Read More  
  • Jurisprudence Over Abstract Ideas Continues In CLS Bank v. Alice Corporation

    07/18/2012 / Glenna L. Gilbert

    In a 2-1 split decision in CLS Bank v. Alice Corporation, the Federal Circuit heldon July 9 that when – after taking all of the claim recitations into consideration – it is not manifestly evident that a claim is directed to a patent ineligible abstract idea, that claim must not be deemed an abstract idea under 35 U.S.C. § 101. In other words, “[u]nless the single most reasonable understanding is that a claim is directed to nothing more than a fundamental truth or disembodied concept, with no limitations in the claim attaching that idea to a specific application, it is inappropriate to hold that the claim is directed to a patent ineligible ‘abstract idea.’

    Read More  
  • The 3 Elements to Avoid Accidental Franchise

    07/10/2012 / Franchise & Distribution Practice Group

    Chuck Modell contributed an article to the LQ Patent Newsletter titled The 3 Elements to Avoid the Accidental Franchise. Modell discusses three elements to avoid when licensing intellectual property to others.

    Read More  
  • Employee Overtime for Cell Phone Use – Employers May Incur Unintended Wage Obligations

    06/29/2012 / Christopher J. Harristhal

    Employers can unwittingly accrue liability for unpaid wages including overtime as a result of employees performing work on cell phones, particularly smart phones or PDAs, after hours or even during lunch breaks. The employee who is using a smart phone to send emails to colleagues or customers is probably working under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), meaning that the time devoted to those tasks is compensable time, which is time for which the employer has to pay. In the event that those minutes and hours push the employee over 40 hours per week, they will also trigger overtime liability. Although not an issue with exempt, salaried personnel under the FLSA, this can be a significant risk for hourly workers.

    Read More  
  • Minnesota Employers Cannot Agree To Refrain From Contesting A Claim For Unemployment Benefits

    06/29/2012 / Daniel J. Ballintine

    The law in Minnesota has long-provided that employers cannot ask employees to waive their rights to unemployment benefits and that any agreement to that effect is void. The Minnesota Legislature has amended Section 268.192 of the Minnesota Statutes that will affect how employers clarify their agreements with employees to provide that they will not contest a claim for unemployment benefits and employees corresponding responses given to DEED.

    Read More  
  • Auto Insurance: Are You Covered? – Minnesota Motorcycle Insurance

    06/18/2012 / Kate Westad

    It’s that time of year again. Warm summer weather brings thousands of motorcycles onto the road ‎each year. In fact, the Minnesota Department of Safety (MDS) reports that “by the end of the ‎calendar year 2011, the number of licensed motorcycle operators and the number of registered ‎motorcycles in Minnesota had reached their highest levels in history.”‎

    Read More  
  • Employee Need Not Invoke MPLA Leaves

    06/04/2012 / Dayle Nolan

    Dayle Nolan was a source for an article for the June issue of Minnesota Lawyer. The article focused on a request for leave from work under the Minnesota Parenting Leave Act and the stipulations of the act’s protections.

    Read More  
  • Arrest and Conviction Records – The EEOC Rolls Out New Enforcement Guidelines

    05/30/2012 / Chris Harristhal

    On April 25, 2012, the EEOC issued a new “Enforcement Guidance” on the use of arrest and conviction records in employment decisions. Although the Enforcement Guidance largely consolidated a variety of prior EEOC analyses on the subject, it also went further and adopted an even more zealous cautionary instruction regarding the use of criminal records.

    Since the federal government has no legislation that expressly prohibits the use of criminal background information, the EEOC has taken it upon itself to discourage employers from using such information and cautioning that the use of an individual’s criminal history in making employment decisions “may, in some instances, violate the prohibition against employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.”

    Read More  
  • NFL Players’ Concussion Injury Litigation-Emerging Trends in Multidistrict Litigation

    05/30/2012 / Melissa L Hagstrum

    In July 2011, seventy-five former NFL players and fifty-one spouses filed a lawsuit against the NFL, NFL Properties, and Riddell and Easton-Bell related companies that design, manufacture, distribute, and sell football equipment, including helmets. This first lawsuit was filed in California state court. Over the next ten months, eighty similar lawsuits were filed across the country by other former NFL players and their spouses. To date, the lawsuits involve more than 2,200 former NFL players and many of their spouses.
    Product designers and manufacturers are watching the former NFL players’ concussion injury litigation closely for emerging trends in multidistrict litigation. Product liability litigation is one of the two most prevalent types of litigation where separate lawsuits pending in different federal district courts may be consolidated

    Read More  
  • The Federal Circuit Directs the Eastern District of Texas to Reconsider Motions to Sever

    05/30/2012 / Glenna L Gilbert

    On petition for a writ of mandamus, the Federal Circuit recently directed the Eastern District of Texas to reconsider motions to sever in light of the test for joinder set forth by the Federal Circuit in In re EMC Corp., Misc. No. 100 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2012).
     
    Petitioners in In re EMC Corp. were eight of eighteen companies named as defendants in a single complaint filed by Oasis Research LLC. Oasis asserted method claims from four patents, all of which dealt with off-site computer data storage. The defendants were all alleged to have offered services that provide online backup and storage for home or business computer users. Defendants moved to sever and transfer the claims against them, arguing that because there was no concert of action, the claims against them did not arise out of the same transaction or occurrence, as required by Rule 20 of the Fe

    Read More  
  • Establishing Diversity Jurisdiction in Franchise Dispute: The Value of Injunctive Relief

    05/03/2012 / Susan E. Tegt

    Susan Tegt contributed an article to the spring newsletter of The Franchise Lawyer.

    Read More  
  • Supreme Court Rejects Patent on Drug Metabolite Correlation in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.

    04/30/2012 / John A. Kvinge

    On March 20, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., 566 U.S. ___ (2012). At issue were two patents covering the use of thiopurine drugs to treat autoimmune conditions such as Crohn’s disease. The Supreme Court concluded that the claims were impermissible attempts to patent a natural law, and held the patents invalid.

    Read More  
  • New Generic Top-Level Domain System Expands Internet Addressing Scheme

    04/30/2012 / Molly T. Eichten

    A significant expansion of the Internet is underway. On January 12, 2012, the Internet Corporation for Names and Numbers (ICANN) began accepting applications from parties who wish to own and maintain new generic top-level domains.

    Read More  
  • Class Action Suit Dismissed Because EEOC Failed to Properly Investigate Before Suing

    03/27/2012 / Christopher Harristhal

    On February 22, 2012, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed an EEOC class suit because the EEOC had failed to investigate the claims of the class members before it sued in September 2007 and failed to offer the employer/defendant a chance to settle those claims through conciliation as required by Section 706 of Title VII. EEOC v. CRST Van Expedited Inc. (8th Cir. Feb. 22, 2012). This case has potentially far-reaching implications for those employers facing an EEOC charge where the Commission fails to fully investigate the claims and come to a probable cause determination before suit. 

    Read More  
  • Achieving Consolidation and Unit Growth Through Private Equity

    03/20/2012 / Chuck S. Modell

    Chuck Modell published an article that was featured in the March edition of the International Franchise Association's Franchising World magazine.

    Read More  

Showing Results 181 - 200 of 600